Saturday, April 20, 2019

Mulling Over Mueller

This post was written after Barr submitted a brief summary of Mueller report. 

After the Mueller report is published, it's like recovering the CVR after a plane crash - a whole lot of data and a lot of opinions from every side.

But what exactly do these opinions mean? Which one is right? Are they all right?

WP and NYT as usual are speaking against Trump and Barr. WSJ is speaking for Barr.

Here is a sample of articles published after the report.


  • What is the big deal about his tax report? It's likely he would have fudged and cheated? What does it prove? How does it help?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/05/23/wall-concealment-trump-built-around-his-finances-is-beginning-crumble/


https://wapo.st/2QB3jgV

The (US) laws that exist today only show that they are inadequate to apply to a character like Mr Trump. An important question in this regard is: What would the Republicans had felt about Mr Trump if he had been a non-Republican? And what would Democrats have felt if he had been a non-Democrat?

If Trump can be manipulated by Russia to do things that are adverse to USA, is he appropriate for his position?

If social media, in its current Avatar, is detrimental to US interests, is it appropriate to have?
If drugs are adverse to a country's interests should they be allowed?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Featured Post

Whom Do We Trust

I came across this: APNews being the trusted source of news for half the world.  And there is Truth Social which also is read and trusted by...