Showing posts with label Rape. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rape. Show all posts

Thursday, March 17, 2022

Rape Theory

Rape is a subject that has interested me for years. Here is a list of news, articles which explain how it's seen, felt, described in India. I have included some of my posts on this subject in the section labelled "Additional reading".


Wiki article on rape: 

"On the other hand, a 2003 study found that the frequency of pregnancy from rape is significantly higher than that of pregnancy in non-coercive intercourse, and advanced the hypothesis that male rapists disproportionately target women exhibiting biological indications of fertility"
He cites a paper by C.A. Fox and Beatrice Fox, reporting that biologist Alan Sterling Parkes had speculated in personal correspondence that "there is a high conception rate in rape, where hormonal release, due to fear or anger, could produce reflex ovulation". Smith also cites veterinary scientist Wolfgang Jöchle, who "proposed that rape may induce ovulation in human females" 

"For example, Tang-Martinez (1997, p. 116) describes a common feminist view that evolutionary psychology is, “inherently misogynistic and provides a justification for the oppression of women.” However, the feminists to whom Tang-Martinez refers are committing what is known as the naturalistic fallacy: the error of deriving what ought to be from what is. This error can be demonstrated clearly with an example: No sensible person would argue that a scientist researching the causes of cancer is thereby justifying or promoting cancer. Yet some people argue that investigating rape from an evolutionary perspective justifies or legitimizes rape" - this is interesting. When feminine women inquire into the cause of a undesirable phenomenon, they are usually in an empathizing / forgiving mode. When researchers inquire into the cause of a phenomenon their purpose is to understand it, control it and ultimately minimize or eliminate it. I have seen this difference often. The F (as in MBTI) reason for going into the cause is very different from the T's reason.
"Related to the naturalistic fallacy is the false belief of genetic determinism: The idea that behavior is unalterable, programmed, or otherwise unchangeable. Biologist John Maynard Smith noted that genetic determinism is, “an incorrect idea that is largely irrelevant, because it is not held by anyone, or at least not by any competent evolutionary biologist” (1997, p. 524). No evolutionary psychologist would argue that because rape is produced by evolved mechanisms, we should accept its occurrence." This contradicts my belief that behavior is largely pre-programmed.

"Wrangham and Peterson (1996) reviewed evidence indicating that male orangutans exist as one of two distinct morphs or behavioral types. The large morphs weigh significantly more, move much slowly, and are typically able to find females willing to mate with them. The small morphs are typically unable to find females willing to mate with them. These small morphs are more likely to chase down and rape females. This represents a conditional strategy. If the smaller males are unable to gain sexual access to females through intrasexual competition and by being attractive to females, they may use the conditional strategy of chasing down and raping a female." - This is fantastic and quite different from what Michael Crichton opines about rape in his lovely novel Disclosure. Fantastic because it provides a simple explanation about what causes the non-alpha male to rape. Is this what Mukesh Singh did?

"A hypothesized design feature of rape adaptations involves mechanisms that cause men to evaluate the sexual attractiveness of rape victims differently than for consensual partners. Specifically, a rapist might be more successful reproductively by maximizing the chance that a one-time forced copulation will result in pregnancy. According to this hypothesis, a would-be rapist may be more likely to target a highly fertile woman than a woman who is less fertile (Thornhill & Palmer, 2000). Human female fertility (current likelihood of conception per copulation) peaks in the early to mid-20s. Therefore, if women in this age range are over-represented in reports of rape, it is possible that this reflects a male adaptation that leads to raping fertile women more often than non-fertile women. Numerous studies have documented that young women are most often targeted by rapists, and that women of peak fertility are over-represented in reported and unreported rapes"

"we propose five types of rapists (or contexts of rape),
  • disadvantaged men who resort to rape [orangutan example] "It is supported by data indicating that rapes are committed disproportionately by men with low socioeconomic status...Furthermore, Krill, Lake, and Platek (2006) presented evidence that men convicted of rape display lower facial symmetry, an indicator of poor genetic quality. Facial symmetry is linked positively with physical and psychological health (Shackelford & Larsen, 1997), and men with lower facial symmetry are perceived as less attractive and as less desirable mates",
  • “specialized” rapists who are sexually aroused by violent sex..."Meta-analyses indicate that convicted rapists demonstrate greater sexual arousal to scenes of sexual coercion involving force than do nonrapists..If a rape is a one-time event, it might make adaptive sense for the rapist to inseminate the woman with an ejaculate that contains a high sperm count or that otherwise increases the chance of successful fertilization. Indeed, Thornhill and Palmer (2000) have hypothesized that some rapists may be capable of producing a high-sperm-count ejaculate that would increase the chance of fertilization. Men seem to be capable of unconsciously adjusting sperm number in ejaculates, such as in response to a greater risk of sperm competition (Baker & Bellis, 1989, 1993), but it is unknown whether rapists adjust sperm numbers during rape",
  • men who rape opportunistically,
  • high-mating-effort men who are dominant and often psychopathic, and
  • partner rapists motivated by assessments of increased risk of sperm competition....Women are particularly likely to be raped by their partner during a breakup instigated by men’s concerns about their partner’s infidelity...Men with partners who committed infidelities, or who suspected that their partner had committed infidelities (indicating increased risk of sperm competition), were more likely to perform sexually coercive behaviors, including rape. These findings are consistent with the existence of psychological mechanisms that motivate men to commit partner rape in response to risk of sperm competition"

"A sample of 169 normally ovulating women watched short segments of videotaped interviews of men. The women were then asked to rate the men on several items that were summed to create an overall coerciveness score. Average coerciveness scores for each man were computed. Finally, women’s menstrual status was estimated using the reverse-cycle counting method. The results indicated that women in the fertile phase of their menstrual cycle rated the men as more sexually coercive. This suggests that women at greater risk of conception may be more attuned to signs of male sexual coerciveness than women at lesser risk of conception." - This could mean that women are more paranoid and not that they identify sexually aggressive men more accurately when they [women] are at maximum risk of becoming pregnant.

"Studies demonstrate that women have a greater fear of stranger rape than of being raped by someone they know. This is despite modern patterns of rape, which indicate that women are more likely to be raped by someone they know. These results may reflect the greater potential costs associated with stranger rape, such as a decreased likelihood of investment by the genetic father of resulting offspring." 

Nice article on women's rape fantasies: 

“The desire of the man,” she opined, “is for the woman, but the desire of the woman is for the desire of the man.” 
"Arousal [and, however involuntarily, most women do lubricate in situations of actual rape] is not consent.”
"What Chivers believes must be emphasized is that such politically incorrect sexual fantasies are absent any imagined negative repercussions. That without including any physical or psychological harm—but rather keying in on the abandoned thrill of being so daringly, illicitly, even roughly, “taken” by a passionate male—they reveal a core element in female eroticism. It’s a “rape” totally liberated from any serious possibility of assault."

"So, in such idealized “pretend scenarios,” a woman can experience her rawest, most unconstrained sexuality as fully, wondrously, even miraculously expressed—in no way impeded by any viscerally felt sense of peril. " 


Why men rape women: 
http://www.2knowmyself.com/why_do_men_rape_women

http://owningyourshit.blogspot.in/search/label/rapeNice article on rape: Quotes: 

"That is, to maintain the definition of rape as the conscious, intentional and willful forcing of sex on a clearly non-consenting person....[In a study]  Because of all the women determined to have been raped, only 27% considered themselves to be rape victims. Yes, that's right. It was the surveyors, not the respondents, who decided who had been raped and who hadn't."

"If women want society to place no special value on a woman's sexual purity as a function of her self-worth, they need to...well, grow up and stop placing special value on it themselves in the context of unwanted sexual attention. That rape is a crime and should be treated as such, I have absolutely no problem with. But that rape is still treated as an "extra-special, super-crime against the 'sanctity' of a woman's body, the worst violation ever, and one that should be treated differently than other crimes because it brings shame and a loss of self-worth to victims"? This is backward thinking in any sexually liberated society. " Wowowow.

Apparently women (and men too perhaps) can pick up subtle signs and spot other women who are ovulating as per this article.

Originally posted 25/6/2017

Additional reading:
  1. http://www.newser.com/story/229936/teen-who-impregnated-teacher-gets-6m-from-district.html? utm_source=part&utm_medium=ozy.com&utm_campaign=pp: Teen male gets $6million for raping teacher
  2. https://vbala99.blogspot.com/2022/03/pink-is-for-men.html
  3. https://vbala99.blogspot.com/2018/10/metoo-got-molested.html : Strongly recommended.
  4. https://vbala99.blogspot.com/2018/09/stockholm-syndrome.html

Pink Is For Men -On Rape - Stories

http://thereel.scroll.in/817340/pink-is-not-for-women-but-for-men-and-boys-says-producer-shoojit-sircar


I have always felt that rape, unless it involved bodily assault as in the case of Nirbhaya, is not a criminal act. Date rape, without violence, for example is not a criminal act - it is no different from a person taking another's money through cajoling.

26/9/2016

Kobe Bryant rape case
I read this wiki article today. It reminded of the discussion I had with a friend a few weeks about rape.

I was telling her that it is very difficult to prove that a man committed rape. She responded that the accuser (woman) would be traumatized and may have semen from the man on her body and that's proof enough. I said it is possible that the woman could have had consensual sex with the accused and could have been later raped by some other man which would cause both the symptoms (accused's semen and trauma).

Additional reading: Excellent post(s) on rape.


Interesting Thing About Strauss-Kahn Case
I read this.

How well that maid told the gang rape story and about her sexual assault in the hotel room!!! She apparently enacted with great verisimilitude.

What made her tell such a story about a man? What was in her mind when she said it? Initially I thought she was perhaps a stooge of Sarkozy's team out to destroy Strauss-Kahn.

I don't know if that was the case. But what is definitely to be appreciated is the way she could emote well in real life about something that didn't happen. Wouldn't it be nice to see how many other wrecks she has left behind?

Raped in a hotel:
I read this now. So sad http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Woman-raped-at-Vasant-Kunj-hotel/articleshow/10470042.cms. My friend Mary concurred with me, the man must have been an animal.

Raped in Dubai



How does it feel to be raped


Pre Marital Sex, Consent And Rape - Recent Judgment




An apology: 


Apparently many of the rapes are by known people who had no business doing it... like uncle, teacher, father, brother's friend... where there is no question of a romantic relationship between the two people. Some friends I know have been molested or raped. And I am not talking about marital rape or date rape etc.

http://m.timesofindia.com/tech/social-media/Girl-posts-nude-pictures-of-boyfriend-on-Facebook/articleshow/40144169.cms




False Allegations and Rape

View Of Indian Rapes From Across The Border
Not Rape Anymore


Rape Again


Rape is about power and not a man woman thing. - Michael Crichton - Disclosure.

Punishment for rape in different countries. https://sv-se.facebook.com/hindutavasinghnad/posts/583215951695807?stream_ref=5

I read an interesting article on rape. This is about how a man should and should not behave and explaining why. While I never had imagined what a woman thinks when she saw me (or any other man), this article reveals something that I had not known. I assume the author's opinion represents what most women feel. 

If such is the case, what would I think when I see a woman near me? 
"Oh, oh here comes another one. Probably thinks her looks and her emotions are valid collateral for getting something tangible from me. And would expect chivalry from me and also that I treat her as an equal. And now of course I ought to feel guilty that I could be a rapist." I am going to become gay. 
And this is another article on rape.

Introduction To Rape:
How do you introduce the word "rape" to your daughter? http://in.lifestyle.yahoo.com/let%E2%80%99s-talk-about-it--fathers--daughters-and-the-r-word-165342171.html


Additional reading:

Monday, October 15, 2018

#MeToo Got Molested - Rape Is Not About Consent

This is a very nice article.

The author clearly is a thinker and not driven by as much by emotions.

What perhaps he doesn't appreciate is that understanding of events, including the accusation of rape, is driven by emotions in some people - the feelers. How such a feeler feels about the event is what determines what he thinks happened. In case of a rape, a feeling of extreme mental discomfort post coitus leads to the belief that rape happened. And the fact, that it was consensual during the act, could be found to be irrelevant in a feeler.
Conversely the feeling of well being post a rape leads to positive feelings towards the rapist (read https://vbala99.blogspot.com/2018/09/stockholm-syndrome.html).

A very similar thing is echoed by a woman: "Rachel (a pseudonym) reeled off a list of unhappy encounters with would-be romantic partners: sex consented to out of a misguided sense of politeness, extreme acts requested and occasionally allowed, degrading insults as things unfolded — and regrets later. “It’s not like I was being forced into anything or that I feel unsafe, but it’s not … good. And I don’t like how I feel afterwards.” " from Consent is not enough. We need a new sexual ethic.. The title of the article is leading. From Washington Post.

Asking a feeler to look only at facts unemotionally is like asking someone like the author of this blog post to avoid facts and logic and just feel about the event or feel for the person who just joined the #metoo.

The expectation is fine and dandy. But is it sensible?

Addional reading:

Saturday, September 29, 2018

Christene Blasey Ford And Brett Kavanaugh

I watched her testimony live. I didn't watch his. I recommended a couple of friends to watch it. Both went to sleep, without watching.

I was curious about this molestation as I am about any act of molestation or rape, there usually being no witness to the act. Especially the question of consent is rather troublesome unless the event was recorded. 

In India, women often accuse a man of rape when he backs out of marrying her. (Latest: https://m.timesofindia.com/city/hyderabad/telangana-iim-a-graduate-arrested-in-rape-and-cheating-case/amp_articleshow/65999106.cms)
When I mentioned this to a friend yesterday, she replied that the woman's consent was contingent on marriage. And hence, she added, where there was no marriage, there was no consent either. And hence that the woman has a right to accuse the man of rape

I didn't agree. The sex happened with consent. The man didn't keep his commitment later. Hence he could or should be charged on a civil offense of welshing and not on a criminal offense of rape. If I were to have sex with a call girl and then didn't pay her, am I to be charged with rape? Is it not a question of cheating her instead of raping her? My friend demurred. She said that in this case it was a commercial transaction. Huh. If I take a loan from you and don't return it - is it any different from taking a loan from a bank and not returning it? Just because the latter is a commercial transaction? I think not. 

I told my friend that a decision to complain of rape seems often related to the woman's emotional reaction to the event rather than to a strict question of consent. Meaning that if the victim feels good she wouldn't accuse the man of rape.

My friend said that the complaint could stem from how the victim related to the accused immediately prior to the event. Deep waters.

Now you understand why I am curious about rape and molestation, especially in cases where there are only two parties (as against a gang rape) and they are known to each other and where the two are of similar age. In such cases, things become very nebulous.

Now, coming to the Senate testimony, no verified facts were presented. And it is difficult to know what exactly happened 35 years back. The whole thing is about making an opinion based on the emotions displayed by either party. Quite dangerous, I would say. In a non-physical conflict between two people, the one that's a lesser (or less sophisticated) feeler is toast. Feeler=emotional person.

See this from 




How much of Ms Ford's demeanor during the senate hearing was staged? She had the little girl's voice and a lump in her throat throughout.
She didn't know the meaning of the word exculpatory? I can't believe it.

I kept thinking about it and then Googled.
A ha. Here it is
Of course I didn't observe as muchas the author nor do I have much understanding of body language. But something about Ms Ford's testimony seemed off, it seemed too stage managed. I wonder whether her team didn't have a conversation with her after the testimony which went something like this "you should have stooped your shoulders more when you said this", "not held you head high when he asked you that", "you should have broken down when you said that". And a similar conversation prior to the testimony. I know of the idea of practicing to get the facts right. But Ms Ford, I think, practised to also get the emotions right.

On Brett Kavanaugh's body language:
https://www.instyle.com/news/brett-kavanaugh-body-language-decoded

There already are 3 women who have accused Judge Kavanaugh of molestation. In a lighter vein, if there are few more would there be a class action suit against him?

Will we ever know what really happened? Will FBI find anything relevant? On Oct 6th, 2018 and beyond how will things look?

An interesting quote from Therapeutic Narratives Needn’t Be Factual https://www.wsj.com/articles/therapeutic-narratives-neednt-be-factual-1538607530: "Consider that according to Ms. Ford, she first told the story during therapy. The therapist’s role is different from that of a detective, journalist or lawyer. When a patient tells me a story, I don’t test it to see if it’s objectively accurate. I may help patients see things from a different perspective, but I never doubt the reality of what they are saying—or, as Sen. Cory Booker put it, of “her truth.” The therapist’s job is to empathize with and believe those in pain." 

Read also this:
http://vbala99.blogspot.com/2018/09/customer-is-always-right.html


Additional Reading
  1. A brief summary of both people's testimony before the senate: https://bigthink.com/politics-current-affairs/kavanaugh-ford-testimonies
  2. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/juliareinstein/christine-blasey-ford-brett-kavanaugh-senate-questions
  3. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-28/blasey-ford-kavanaugh-testimony-represents-her-generation/10315614
  4. http://lucianne.com/thread.aspx/?artnum=953422
  5. https://pointofview.net/articles/mistaken-identity/
  6. The Senate’s Job Isn’t to Kill a Mockingbird https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-senates-job-isnt-to-kill-a-mockingbird-1538607608 Killed by a MockingFord
  7. https://www.wsj.com/articles/tomorrows-elite-lawyers-disavow-due-process-1538695941: Quote: "The #BelieveSurvivors mantra is a cornerstone of the campus grievance industry but inimical to everything that a law school should teach. It’s a religious gesture, not a legal one: Such belief is independent of proof, arising out of a pre-existing commitment to a narrative of ubiquitous female abuse by patriarchal white males. The “survivor” label presupposes the conclusion that evidence should establish: that the accused is guilty of an offense. The fact-finder, if there even is one, regards contradictions or holes in a woman’s story as evidence of “trauma” and thus as further corroboration. According to #BelieveSurvivors logic, the Innocence Project, which exists to vacate wrongful convictions and has a presence at law schools across the country, should be disbanded.    Examples abound of student rape allegations arising out of voluntary drunken hookups, following which the self-described victim sought further sexual contact with her alleged rapist. Even if such cases weren’t so common, to presume the guilt of the accused based on an accusation alone would still be an affront to due process. From Tomorrow’s Elite Lawyers Disavow Due Process." 
  8. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/10/04/brett-kavanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-credible-psychology-research-column/1510524002/ and https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2018/10/04/false-accusations-kavanaugh-ford-innocent-column/1488329002/
  9. http://vbala99.blogspot.com/2018/09/stockholm-syndrome.html - true life story of a gang rape.
  10. https://vbala99.blogspot.com/2018/10/metoo-got-molested.html
  11. https://www.theguardian.com/law/2022/may/05/trump-justices-abortion-roe-v-wade-gorsuch-kavanaugh-coney-barrett?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other
  12. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/the-mind-of-donald-trump/480771/: On Brett and Trump
  13. https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2018/09/the-impunity-of-brett-kavanaughs-binge-drinking/571435/

Sunday, September 2, 2018

Stockholm Syndrome

I have always been interested, morbidly so, in rapes, extra marital affairs, sex, criminal behavior etc. 

Recently a friend Y from Europe told me about an incident from her life. She had been raped couple of years back while on a trip to Africa with her boyfriend M. Apparently there were 5 men A, B, C, D, E. It was a gangrape. And that she had enjoyed it.

As I showed interest, she went on to tell me all. For hours, over few days we spoke only on this topic. Neither of us was getting bored in the process.

What happened was something like this:
She and her boyfriend visited a certain country in Africa. They visited many places, had a good time. Finally they landed at the city where the events unfolded. They had booked separate hotel rooms for the two of them since they weren't married and since local custom demanded that unmarried couples not stay in the same room.

The incident happened over two days. The first day she and her boyfriend were at a bar along with many other people, local and foreign. My friend is a very attractive woman and she was wearing a dress that would raise hundreds of eyebrows. Her boyfriend had earlier cautioned her against such dress. But my friend wouldn't listen. This caused a good amount of rift between the two of them. 

Later in the night most patrons had left the bar. Only my friend, her boyfriend and two locals A, B remained. The locals made disparaging remarks about my friend Y. Soon they were hurling insults at each other. A and B also tried to physically assault Y. Her boyfriend M stepped in. And then Y and M retired to their respective rooms. My friend was irritated with M. She ended up being frustrated. When I asked her about it, she told me that she was ovulating at that time and wanted to look feminine and had insisted on wearing a particular dress much against the wishes of M.

The next day, the arguments between Y and M continued. My friend refused to relent. She wore a daring dress. She insisted that there was nothing wrong in her wanting to look feminine.

Later at night when Y was alone sleeping in her room she woke up with a start. And found 5 men A, B, C, D, E in her room. A and B were the same two men from the previous night in the bar, now joined by three more.

She was lying on her back. A was holding her legs. B was holding her wrists. The others C, D, E were around her. The 5 men were old, ugly and mean. My friend told me that the men proceeded with the activities with a calm, patience and seriousness that was eerie. They were like experienced surgeons in the Operating Theater.

It was as though they had practiced rape often. The first man A insisted that my friend look at his face constantly. She physically resisted them with all her strength while being raped by A. But they were 5 of them. She pleaded with them. It was about 20 minutes since the men had begun assaulting her. 
But the men had come to hunt. It was likely premeditated. They weren't going to go away without getting what they wanted. 

Reaching the end of her strength, she yelled at them using profane expressions. She closed her eyes and turned her head to the side.

The first man A then slapped her. He pulled her chin up and made her look at him. He wanted her to make continuous eye connect with him.

At this point my friend's resolve weakened completely. Her expression changed. A and B interpreted her expression correctly.  They released her hands. Y lifted her hands up and smiled at the men. 

She had decided at this time to surrender unconditionally to them. She simultaneously felt emotionally close to these men, as though they were her husbands instead of her rapists.

Then, she continued with her story, she had sex with them with gay abandon and that it was the best sex of her life.

When we discussed further, she told me that she felt closer to the 5 men maybe because they had insulted her boyfriend, maybe because they admired her sexy dress - which (dress) had been the cause of serious rift between her and her boyfriend. Maybe hence the 5 men had become her allies instead of being hated by her.

After the men left what she felt was deep satisfaction, pride, fear, guilt, joy, sadness.

After the event she never called the police, didn't inform her embassy, didn't tell M, nor her parents. To this day only a handful of people know about this. She said she didn't call the police because she wanted to avoid the hassles of a lengthy and perhaps inefficient legal process one could expect in a third world country. But I guessed she didn't find it right to lodge a complaint when she consented to it halfway through.

She feels awful about what happened. And yet even today she would want to have her baby fathered by A but brought up by M. See the conflict?

My friend is an open person and she didn't obfuscate any part of the story. She asked me only one question; Why did she give in to the men and get ready to join them instead of fighting with them till the end or even passing out. This was nagging her. And me too.

I made a list of pertinent things:
  1. Sleeping in different rooms
  2. Argument with boyfriend about dress. Ovulation makes a woman daring in her behavior. The fact that A and B had been deeply attracted to her the previous night prior to the fight made an impact on her.
  3. Points above made Y weak, vulnerable, unable to resist or fight for long
  4. Usually women come online for virtual sex or  to flirt after a serious argument with their partner.
  5. Staring at A's eyes and being needed by them intently added to it.
  6. Their calm and patience made her comfortable. They were alpha males and she was attracted to them. That A and B, from the previous night, were among the five men enhanced her experience. I guess the men  bet among themselves that the victim would consent before each gangrape incident was completed.
  7. That she hated being assaulted by the 5 men became irrelevant. 
  8. Y wanted to be satisfied and to satisfy them. Hence she gave up her fight.

Points 1-4 above had weakened her S2. Her S1 took over causing her to surrender. Points 5-8 facilitated her to enjoy the night that had earlier begun as a nightmare. The 5 men, especially A and B were experts who turned a helpless victim into a willing participant.
Once she gave in, the enjoyment followed. The turning point was her decision to surrender.

My question to my friend was: The decision to surrender was made by S1. How can she take responsibility for it and feel guilt? 

She is still not fully convinced. But it has brought her closer to understanding the things that were crucial and things that were irrelevant.

I can't but help wonder how it would have been if I were in her place. Makes me also wonder about those 5 men. What kind of a game were they playing? It is quite likely that the hotel staff and the local police were in cahoots with the 5 men, if not they were part of the 5 man team.

The question that arises is: is it so easy to make a rape victim participate eagerly in the act? Do the bullet points mentioned above suggest a recipe for it? Troubling.



Additional Reading:

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome - The bullet points in this article seem very relevant.
  2. How to Sell Your Rape Story
  3. From the novel Media Justice by Dennis Carstens: "The last time she met Doyle like this, having not eaten anything since breakfast, after four glasses of wine, Doyle was starting to look pretty good to her. Fortunately, her rational brain was still working and she managed to get out of there and home unsullied."
  4. https://qz.com/980766/the-truth-about-false-rape-accusations/
  5. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/british-teenager-held-for-false-claim-that-12-israelis-raped-her-in-cyprus-6dq3x07s7
  6. The 22-Year-Old Force Behind Egypt’s Growing #MeToo Movement

Popular Posts

Featured Post

Can't You Take A Few More Steps

Recently a friend of mine asked his sister whether she couldn't take a few steps to help him out. It happens that she had done plenty fo...