While talking to people we realize that some of them (typically SF) are exceedingly good at describing things.
Others (NT) are very good at analyzing things.
To the average audience, they seem similar. The first set are good at recounting the What, When, Who, Where and How.
The second set go about explaining the Why.
When done eloquently and nicely, the What, When, Who, Where and How description is as interesting as the Analysis of Why.
The funny thing is that the two sets of people bore each other.
The first set thinks of the How and especially the When, Who, Where and How as a surrogate for Why. The second set desires brevity so much that it replaces all the others with its Why thus missing the sensory picture.
The first set thinks of the How and especially the When, Who, Where and How as a surrogate for Why. The second set desires brevity so much that it replaces all the others with its Why thus missing the sensory picture.
No comments:
Post a Comment