T(hinker) and F(eeler) as in MBTI, differ in one interesting respect.
For an F, need gives a right. It is often expressed as "who else can i ask?" - meaning I have a need and I don't have anyone else to ask. The fact that the person being asked isn't obligated to give doesn't matter. That he is the only one who can be asked is all that matters to the person who is asking.
For a T, a positive evaluation and reward is based on who has delivered or achieved. For an F, a reward (or support) is given to whoever hasn't achieved. F recognizes need as the currency for transactions.
T recognizes performance as currency.
Since F asks based on need and not an performance, there is an inherent pride-less transaction. A "T" caught in the middle of many F's feels shocked. If the T also happens to be in a position to provide or shell out he is automatically expected to provide since he is surrounded by needy people and he doesn't normally express any need. This is legitimate gang rape.
No comments:
Post a Comment