Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts

Thursday, April 2, 2020

Religion, Negotiation vs Nature

India Today: It’s time to stay in mosques, Allah will save us: Tablighi Jamaat chief told followers in leaked audio.

This is the time when some (like the maulana) follow faith and disregard science. This is also the time when we find that the bluster and negotiation skills of people (like Donald Trump) doesn't work with nature. 

I used to wonder what exactly was different with people like Trump. Trump with his grandstanding, with his tendency to bamboozle, berate, belittle others, lie pathologically has been effective with humans. 
His tendencies fail to be effective against nature. This is typical of people without content.

There was an article in New York Times on Apr 6, 2020 along similar lines: Autocrats’ Dilemma: You Can’t Arrest a Virus

Monday, December 30, 2019

Ashkenazi Jews And Sensitivity


The purpose of analysis and research is to come out with formulas that can be applied with accuracy elsewhere too. So long as the formulas pertain to things like relativity or gravity there seems to be no problem. The moment we mention a formula that pertains to people (whether Ashkenazi Jews or Women or Indians or blondes...) we seem to face a problem. We are told that we are racist, judgmental. Instances like the ex Dean of Harvard or the Google employee, (both of whom mentioned that women were generally not as fit as men for STEM discipline and both of whom had to leave their institutions) come to mind. Instead of looking at whether the data and conclusion are accurate we tend to look at whether the conclusion affects the sensitivities of people. The same thing happened with Darwin. His conclusion affected the sensibilities of religious people. 

Sensitivity to sentiments seems to come in the way of science and analysis.

If research has to be constantly mindful of how its conclusions may affect the sentiments of certain sections of the population we may as well start taking long strides forward to the 10th century.

Can emotions be conducive to understanding truth (formulas)?

Additional reading

  1. The Jews and American Progress : Unbelievable! Letters to the editor re: the original article.
  2. https://vbala99.blogspot.com/2015/09/intelligence-variation-with-religion.html

Friday, December 20, 2019

Take To The Streets

Scroll.in: The Daily Fix: India has a loud message for Modi-Shah – we won’t let you turn us into a Hindu nation.

It's nice to see when non-Muslims come against the citizenship thing. It's nice to see women come against issues towards women. Or when men wake up to issues against women.
Makes me wonder if Imran Khan or other Muslims in pak will take to the streets when there are issues against minorities. No of course, it won't happen. It need not happen. Pak is not bound by secularism, it being a country with a single language (not English), single religion, single hatred (of Hindus and India). 

Sad.

Monday, September 23, 2019

Damn These Hindus


It's sad that we think (maybe it's true also) that Modi dealt with Kashmir because it is a Muslim minority state.

It's equally sad that Pakistan vociferously objects to that act - likely again because it's seen as anti- Muslim. 

Can people think ANYTHING outside of the purview of religion?

Maybe terrorism would cease in the region, maybe pakistan would come out of grey in FATF. 

If only we all treated each other as human beings rather than viewing things though a religious (jaundiced) lens.

Thursday, August 8, 2019

India Pakistan Border Video

Mast video in Kashmir. River separating the 2 countries. Religion is probably a bigger idealogy than politics. Maybe that's why Checkpoint Charlie came down 30 years back while the border between the 2 countries keeps getting stronger.




Note:
Video links may not always work, they may be removed.

Additional reading

Love Thy Neighbor's (35A) Wife

If you are in love with your neighbor's wife and if you feel that your neighbor has put her under house arrest, you would tend to feel that you personally have been affronted. And you break off relations with your neighbor not because he isn't treating his wife well but because you feel he isn't treating your wife well.

At the end of the day one wonders which is a bigger issue. That the neighbor didn't treat his wife well (assuming this to be a fact) or that you think of his wife as yours.

Do things change if the neighbor wasn't legally married to the woman but only cohabiting with her and then decided to make the arrangement legal?

Of course the woman's decision is crucial. Even if the neighbors "wife" is unwilling to go thru the marriage, what is your locus standi especially if she is an "adult over the age of 18". 

All this hoopla is only because the neighbor's woman and you belong to the same faith!!

Any resemblance of this issue to the current Kashmir issue is purely intentional. Well, if one is displeased with the behavior of men across the border, let's not forget our Biradari in our own side https://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/eyeing-the-girls-of-j-k-119080901476_1.html

A sweet forward in the same spirit: 
I changed my JIO WiFi password. Now my neighbour is not happy. He is shouting that he will go to Vodafone and complain about this.. And also in anger, He swiched off his own electricity light to show his protest.. 

Funny Neighbour....


Tuesday, April 23, 2019

Kunti And Karna

In Mahabharathathe story of the relationship between Kunthi and her illegitimate son Karna is interesting. 

After he gets to know that Kunti is his mother they have a affectionate reunion. Soon Kunti asks Karan to leave the Kauravas and join her other 5 sons, the Pandavas. He explains why he is indebted to Duryodhan, the eldest of the Kaurava brothers.

His mother asks him two favors. 1. That he should not fight against or kill any Pandava other than Arjuna who is Karna's sworn enemy. 2. That Karna should not use the deadly Nagastra (a guided missile!) more than once against Arjuna.

Both these favors together more or less eliminate the possibility of Karna doing much harm to the Pandavas while the favors  he granted endanger Karna's own life. It's noteworthy that Kunti didn't grant Karna nor did Karna ask his "new mother" any favor to help protect his own life.

Of course Karna, being the person he was, unhesitatingly grants his mother the favors she asks of him. And in the war, he is killed by Arjuna. 

What I find interesting is that Kunti ensured that her 5 legitimate sons were protected , even if it meant the end of her illegitimate and eldest son. While she makes a show of all sons being equal in her eyes (that the new bride was to be shared by her 5 sons, read here) she makes a clean distinction between the eldest and the younger 5 sons. What is remarkable is her calculating mind at work when she asks Karna the two favors while at the same time having an emotional reunion with him. 


This story is as per the Tamil film Karnan. Quote from the movie's wiki "Karnan is based on the life of the character Karna from the Hindu epic Mahabharata. B. R. Panthulu, who directed and produced the film under the banner Padmini Pictures, had collected most of his information from scholars Kripananda Variar and Anantarama Dikshitar.

I am reminded of mother birds and mother crocodiles that sacrifice their own young runt in order to survive or to increase the survival probability of her stronger children.

It's sad and thought provoking that Kunti saw a runt in Karna.

Saturday, March 23, 2019

Bhagwad Gita And Mistakes

A friend was stressing a line from Bhagwad Gita - "Do your work, don't focus on results".

This is the only thing I know of Gita and I have thought a lot about it. While discussing with my friend we happened to be touch on ambition. And I told her that the Gita statement above contradicted the concept of ambition. She was not convinced nor at that time did I have a convincing explanation for my opinion.

Later we again touched base. This time she was mentioning that a person should not be afraid of taking action and if the action results in a problem then they should learn from the mistake and not make the same mistake. 

This time I was sure that she was violating the Gita. To learn from a mistake, you have to focus on the end result. If you didn't focus on the end result, you will just keep doing the same thing again and again. 

Ambition has a goal associated with it and
focuses on the end result. If the end result is not what we wanted we change what we do. Ask any entrepreneur.


This directly conflicts with Gita of not focusing on the result.

QED.

Here is an interesting example. HUD is charging Facebook with targeting ads instead of showing the same ads to all users. We target ads because showing ads to everyone isn't useful, some people make better potential customers. How do we know that? We targeted ads at various people and looked at the results. Oh my, but we aren't supposed to look at results, we are only to target ads (at everyone).
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/03/28/hud-charges-facebook-with-housing-discrimination/

Does this mean Bhagwad Gita (that one statement) is wrong? I don't think so. It's aimed at an average person, not ambitious, not an entrepreneur. "Qaabil bano, kaamyaabi apne aap aa jaayegi" from the movie 3 Idiots echoes Gita's sentiment.

The interesting thing was that kinda not able to explain to my friend why I intuitively felt that ambition and Gita couldn't coexist. But when she said that we ought to learn from our mistakes, the reasoning became obvious to me.

Additional Reading
https://vbala99.blogspot.com/2019/03/epporul-yaaryaar-vaai-ketpunum.html

Monday, March 4, 2019

God Inherits Earth

A friend of mine, along with two of her bosom buddies, visited about 20 to 30 temples about 200km away over a 2 day period. This was a couple of months back.

Today, one of the three (not my friend) has lost her husband, the other two, well, if i said life has been a little difficult for both of them, then that would be a gross understatement.

My friend's husband has been involved in a misdemeanor. My friend, who is a very upright person, found this act very distasteful.

Well i had a conversation with her today. It went something like this:
Me: Just 2 days visiting temples and then all 3 of you had so many serious problems. Yet you continue doing similar things.

She: It has nothing to do with this. Serious problems are fateful .... Destiny.

Me: What your husband did was a serious problem?

She: Oh yes. That's man made serious problem. Nothing to do with God.

Me: Your logic is wrong. Think about it. If both sets of problems (one concerning the aftermath of Temple visit and the 2nd being the misdemeanor by my friend's husband) are serious and hence, as per your logic, they are both fateful. But in the first set, you exonerate God. But in your husband's case, you hold him accountable for a serious, hence fateful, problem. How do you explain it?

End of conversation

My explanation:
If there are 2 problems, both serious and hence "fateful" and if we think We can't hold God responsible for the 1st fateful problem (meaning even God can't handle those), how can we hold man accountable for the 2nd serious and fateful problem?

What logic is my friend using? I asked her to take time to respond. I am predicting that she will stick to her opinion about God not being responsible but holding her husband still responsible. And that she will recant or rephrase her logic avoiding "serious =fateful".

The word fateful that my friend used was what caused all this confusion.

The question is: why did she use the word fateful when i asked her about the problems after the Temple visit. 

Why does she want to exonerate God who is so powerful and hold a simple poor man completely accountable?


I would hold a bigger person more accountable for the same/similar serious crime. Holding a much smaller man more accountable just isn't conscientious. Nope.

If the meek husband is going to be held accountable for a serious issue, and if the omnipotent God is going to be just given a slap on the wrist or even completely exonerated, then the meek shall not inherit the Earth.

After reading this, would she ask her father (a very rational person) for his opinion and hence perhaps change hers and not judge her husband too harshly? I doubt it. She is wedded to her pet opinion (that man and children should take responsibility for their actions while women and God don't). 

Sunday, February 17, 2019

Muslims Under Attack

This is an excellent article.
Throughout the article there is no fact to support the assertion that Muslims are under attack because of the JeM incident in Kashmir. Except this "The shock attack has caused widespread anger across India and a violent backlash against Kashmiris elsewhere in the country."

So we assume anything said about Kashmiri refers to Muslim?

It reminded me of the way many people talk when they make a pointed statement and subsequently there is a lot of other things they say but none of which substantiates the original statement.

Does the person think that a lot of other statements would be construed as proof by the audience of the original allegation?

When one expresses a pain and points a finger at another, perhaps the pain is the proof.

Does the fact that JeM claimed responsibility mean anything to the author of the article?

Additional Reading

  1. https://m.economictimes.com/news/defence/financial-action-task-force-to-be-given-dossier-to-blacklist-pakistan-for-terror-links/articleshow/68026309.cms
  2. https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pakistan-claims-to-fulfilling-sanctions-obligations-against-jem/articleshow/68036595.cms

Friday, December 21, 2018

Path To God And Morality

When what you want is much more than what your drive or talent can provide, then:
  1. You turn to God, Vaastu etc. This is usually packaged as a quest towards spirituality, inner peace, helping the needy etc. One needs to recognize it for what it is. Look towards the person's generosity. Such people are often not generous. They may occasionally pay Paul. But they are likely to have robbed many Peter's en route.
  2. You become feminine (give what you can and ask for what you need). Incidentally this belief is also shared by communism. The insidious nature of this can be observed when someone does a lot to address your needs and all they get is a thanks (eg., recall the Thank You note written by Helen Hunt to Jack Nicholson in As Good As It Gets). Then you realize that you were primarily looking at getting your needs met and what you could do in return was (SASC and) say Thanks. They have been paid in full for services rendered. Is this such a bad thing? You gave them back what you could, which happened to be a heartfelt thanks. Imagine driving to a Volvo dealership and asking them to give you a car because you need one and all you have to pay for it is your good heart which can say an earnest Thanks. When all (that's a hyperbole) your payments are in intangible things and all (hyperbole once again) your receipts are tangible things, ain't that nice. This idea has been explained more eloquently in Atlas Shrugged.
  3. Steal, murder and do other immoral / illegal things.
The above points are a continuous spectrum. A person having one of the above characteristics may or may not have the rest of the characteristics.
Only the 3rd point is illegal. The 1st and 2nd points aren't. 
The 1st point gives an indication of your nature, that of your unmet needs, couched in socially correct language. 
The 2nd is very subtle and uses social interaction for one's benefit at the cost of another's. The 3rd of course takes what belongs to someone else by force and is immediately recognized as unlawful. The 2nd is never seen as unlawful.

Monday, June 11, 2018

Evolution And Vishnu

A friend sent me this:
"Mom, I am a genetic scientist. I am working in the US on  the evolution of man. Theory of evolution. Charles Darwin, have you heard of him? " Vasu asked.


          His Mother sat next to him,  smiled and said, "I know about Darwin, Vasu. But Have you heard of Dashavatar? The ten avatars of Vishnu?" 


Vasu replied yes. 


          "Ok! Then let me tell you what you and your Darwin don't know.


        Listen carefully- 


        The first avatar was the Matsya avatar, it means the fish. That is because life began in the water. Is that not right?" 


          Vasu began to listen with a little more attention.


            She continued, "Then came the Kurma Avatar, which means the tortoise, because life moved from the water to the land. The amphibian! So the Tortoise denoted the evolution from sea to land.


            Third avatar was Varaha, the wild boar, which meant the wild animals with not much intellect, you call them the Dinosaurs, correct?" Vasu nodded wide eyed.


            "The fourth avatar was Narasimha, half man and half animal, the evolution from wild animals to intelligent beings.


            Fifth, the Vaman avatar, the midget or dwarf, who could grow really tall. Do you know why that is? Because, there were two kinds of humans, Homo Erectus and Homo Sapiens and Homo Sapiens won that battle." 


            Vasu could see that his Mother was in full flow and he was stupefied.


          "The Sixth avatar was Parshuram, the man who wielded the axe, the man who was a cave and forest dweller. Angry, and not social.


          The seventh avatar was Ram, the first rational thinking social being, who practised and laid out the laws of society and the basis of human relationships.


          The Eighth avatar was Balarama, a true farmer who showed  value of agriculture in the life.


          The Ninth avatar was Krishna, the statesman, the politician, the diplomat, the Ambassador, the sutile interpreter, the lover who played the game of society and taught how to live and thrive in the adhaarmic social structure.


          And finally, my boy, will come Kalki, the man you are working on. The man who will be genetically supreme."


            Vasu looked at his Mother speechless. "This is amazing Mom, how did you .... ? This makes sense!"


          She said, "Yes it does, son! We Indians knew some amazing things, but just didn't know how to pass it on scientifically. So we made them into mythological stories.  Mythology creates faith and makes man sensible. It is just the way you look at it - Religious or Scientific. Your call."

That's evolution explained from Hindu religion. yet it's all about Vishnu (no Shiva).

Now, what does this story, told by mother to son, prove?

  1. That the ten avatars of God existed? No, where is this proved?
  2. That the Gods knew about evolution? No, if God's existence or His avatars aren't proved, where is the question of His knowing about evolution? Of course God being  omniscient, He knows everything including evolution. You dontd need the Dashavatar story, as told by the mother, to prove it.
  3. That our Rishis knew about evolution and they created the story of the Dashavatars which follows the same path as organisms did in evolution? Maybe so or maybe it's just an accident. Even then how fish evolved into tortoise is not explained.
Addional reading:

Saturday, March 24, 2018

Shiv Mandirs

I have been to some Shiva temples. And I have come to know about some temples recently which I have not yet visited. These are some popular Shiv Mandirs:
The picture below is of Viswanathar (Shiv) temple at Tenkasi. All pictures are taken by me.


Shown below are photos of couple of Murugan (Kartik) temples. This picture below is Thirumalai Kovil near Panpozhi.




The pictures below are of Ilanji Kumaraswamy temple. One outside the temple. The elephant is inside the temple.





It's gorgeous when you look outside from the Ilanji temple. Lush green rice fields as far as the eye can see. Ilanji, Tenkasi, Shengottah, Five falls form the boundary of an area inside which is one of the most beautiful places of Tamil Nadu.



Additional reading:

Written on 11-4-2012

Monday, February 19, 2018

L'Affaire Clandestine Le Muslims

We all know how angry Muslims were with USA and how that triggered the 9/11 incident. And then after US marines took out Osama Bin Laden in Abbotabad, Pakistan, the fury of Muslims has known no bounds. This time the big guns in Saudi and ISIS decided to use some finesse, the Russian way. They decided to ruin USA in an entirely non-violent, if not legal, way. (Some juicy stuff here: Trump Jr. and Other Aides Met With Gulf Emissary Offering Help to Win Election https://nyti.ms/2IV6EpU.

Just about this time came the US presidential election. So they (Muslims) found the best way to ruin America. They hired some Russians and impersonated few Russians and made it seem as though it was the Russians that fiddled with the US elections. The Muslims ensured that they made Russians the fall guys and they also ruined America. 

That leads us to the 63.9 million dollar question: How exactly did the Muslims ruin the US? 

Muslims made a cartoon character the President of the USA. Here is an article about the cartoon's response to the finding that Russians were definitely involved with messing with the elections (though the Americans are yet to find about the Muslims program managing the whole affair): Trump’s Evolution From Relief to Fury Over the Russia Indictment 

It isn't long before the Muslim dream comes true. With Trump at the helm,  USA will be on its knees soon. 

I am predicting that US will create a 10 billion dollar fund and offer it to any country who will accept a certain immigrant (an ex president) as its full time resident citizen and who will also not provide him with a passport. 


Perhaps a better president might be the incumbent's namesake, a famous name created by Disney. 


Additional reading:

  1. President Trump seems to be saying more and more things that aren’t true
  2. The four times Trump signed tax returns for his foundation that contained incorrect information - https://wapo.st/2yG8szg
  3. When investigators threatened his power, he declared himself dictator: https://wapo.st/2M77CgB
  4. Mueller and Trump: Born to wealth, raised to lead. Then, sharply different choices. http://wapo.st/2CBPCG5
  5. How Trump made up with Australia’s prime minister after a ‘most unpleasant call’Questions linger about how Melania Trump, a Slovenian model, scored ‘the Einstein visa’
  6. Justice official alerted White House to ongoing issues in Kushner’s security clearance
  7. Bizarre legal brawl intensifies at Trump hotel in Panama
  8. Kushner’s Business Got Loans From Companies After White House Meetings: It will be interesting to ask the father in law (FIL) and SIL what their definition of conflict of interest is.
  9. Questions linger about how Melania Trump, a Slovenian model, scored ‘the Einstein visa’
  10. Jared Kushner Flames Out
  11. Trump Lawyer’s Payment to Porn Star
  12. Tillerson Is Out as Secretary of State; Trump Taps Pompeo
  13. Trump’s Stormy History: The Seven-Year Battle Between the President and the Porn Star
  14. Wooing Saudi Business, Tabloid Mogul Had a Powerful Friend: Trump - what would Ayn Rand say of this deal making?
  15. https://wapo.st/2FjFCXD: "Keeping opponents offbalance is the key to negatiation"

Tuesday, October 31, 2017

Minorities In Pakistan - Census Statistics

I had always thought minorities get a raw deal especially in Muslim countries and hence they are usually converted into the local religion or killed or forced to emigrate. 
I got into discussion with a friend who said I was completely wrong. As an example she told me that the treatment of Hindus in Pakistan was fine considering that Pakistan is primarily an Islamic country.

I was shocked by this assertion. So we decided that I will look up some statistics about minority population growth / decline in Pakistan over a decade or few decades. If there was a substantial decline it might indicate that minorities weren't treated well.

So I started googling.
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism_in_Pakistan
According to Pew Research, the Hindu population will reach 5.6 million and Hindus will constitute 2.47% of the Pakistan population by 2050.However, Hindus in Pakistan feel that they are treated as second-class citizens and many have continued to migrate to India. Hindus comprised 15% of Pakistan's population in the year 1947 while Sikhs comprised 5% of the total population. After Pakistan gained independence from British India on 14 August 1947, 4.7 million of West Pakistan's Hindus and Sikhs migrated to India while 6.5 million Muslims moved from India to live in West Pakistan.

The above provides a historical perspective and a prediction about the future.  

From the same link the population of Hindus in Pakistan is 3,231,220 million (2011) which is 2.12% of the Pakistani population.

Next we come to the Hindu population in 1998 which is given to be 2.443 million. And we look here to look at the overall population of Pakistan in the same year 1998 - we get a value of 132.3 million from the graph

The Hindu population in 1998 as a percentage of overall Pakistan population is 2.442/132.3 = 1.8%.

Thus the Hindu population percentage in Pakistan seems to have gone up from 1.8% in 1998 to 2.12% in 2011. (Incidentally the Hindu population was 15% of Pak population in 1947. There was a good amount of migration of and carnage of the minorities on both sides of the border).

Assuming the statistics are reliable, I guess my friend was right. Hindu population has increased as a percentage of overall population in Pakistan from 1998 till 2011.

As on Aug 5, 2020
I read an article in New York Times which threw more light on this topic. The New York Times: Poor and Desperate, Pakistani Hindus Accept Islam to Get By.
"At independence in 1947, Hindus composed 20.5 percent of the population of the areas that now form Pakistan. In the following decades, the percentage shrank rapidly, and by 1998 — the last government census to classify people by religion — Hindus were just 1.6 percent of Pakistan’s population. Most estimates say it has further dwindled in the past two decades."

So, yes the percentage of Hindus is largely same from 1980 till now. Between considering 1947 as the base, the story is different. Well what one can expect from a nation that is thrilled primarily about its religion and has little else to talk about.

Additional reading

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

Triple Talaq (TT)

I read this article from Mint: Indian women are paving the way for social reforms. http://google.com/newsstand/s/CBIwzvC0-Tk

Muththalaq (as it is called in Tamil) or triple talaq - is very anti woman.  There are two ways of addressing it. The first is how other Muslim countries and now India have done it. Abolish TT.   There is another way. I am surprised no one has thought of it. 

What if women were also empowered to divorce their spouses through the TT route. What will happen then? 

How often will women use TT?  
Imagine a man comes home from work and asks his wife what there is for dinner. He finds another man in the house.  The wife says TT, tells him to get out of the house, hands over the kids to him and locks the door (from the inside). Lets not get into why she did this.. She may have been sick and tired of her husband and wanted a change. 

What does the man do now?  Run to his maika? File a sec 498 against his wife and in laws? 

It's difficult to imagine a man with kids and no house and wife.  I refer you to the role the elder of the Nassar twins played in the Tamil movie Jeans (Aishwarya Rai was the lead). After his wife dies, he leaves home with his new born twins.

Which court of law can such a man appeal to? Can he ask for alimony? We assume the wife didn't file a case against the husband for Maintenance of the house. 

Now let's assume things are a little different. She retains the kids and kicks the husband out after uttering TT. WHAT THEN?  The husband has lost the kids and the house. Maybe if he has a job... 

Assume the wife utters TT and takes the kids and leaves the house and the husband.  The man retains a house but loses the kids. 

Awful for the man huh? But then this (or its mirror image or some variation) is how it was for women when men uttered TT and got rid of their wives unceremoniously. It is no different in the case of Anitha (http://vbala99.blogspot.com/2017/09/neetliness-should-be-next-to-state.html) who thought that if she got good marks in the Board exam she would get a medical seat. Unfortunately life presented an unexpected twist and things turned out differently for her and for countless outlet Tamil Nadu state board students.

A sudden nasty shock such as TT is difficult to bear. 

Friday, August 4, 2017

Meaning Of Life In A World Without Work

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/08/virtual-reality-religion-robots-sapiens-book; This is a lovely article about how life might be when most work is taken away from human beings, to and is automated. 

When people do the most mundane work and they cannot be eliminated, we tend to revere them and give them dummy work instead and convince ourselves that we need the dummy work's output. 

When most work has been automated, we will create new jobs tailor made for those unemployed and unemployable and embellish those jobs as ones that are critical for society, for its morale and for its sustenance. That could be in the form of raising children, creating religion, playing or dancing. Anything that automation has not yet taken over would be a good candidate for society to "revere" and hand over to the unemployable.

Sunday, April 16, 2017

Why Hindus In India Behave Like Muslims Now - Fight Or Flight?

A friend sent me this article and said that it explains why Hindus are behaving like Muslims. I thought of something else.

Both Muslims - let's not leave Catholics, they are also similar. Recently I read an article that explained why northern Europe was more advanced and richer than countries in Southern Europe. The author suggested that it was because the south was and is predominantly Catholic while the north is largely Protestant - and Ayn Rand have one thing in common. 

Neither could stand people who were different. Both wanted people to convert to their religion. Ayn Rand's religion was of course Laissez Faire Capitalism. But there was one difference. Rand would never use force. While Muslims (and Catholics) use force.

What makes one set of people use force while another party doesn't? Is it that Ayn Rand was intelligent and hence never needed to use force? Does it mean that people use force largely because they can't get their desires met any other way?

No. Physical force (that an alpha male uses) is but one way to get what you want but can't get through other peaceful and fair means. Emotional and verbal bullying (that feminine people indulge in) is another way to achieve it. Neither I think was Ayn Rand's way.

She insisted on fair play, in every transaction, devoid of physical aggression or emotional manipulation. And her heroes in Atlas Shrugged refused to have anything to do with the "non-Rands" (Jim, Lilian, Philip Rearden etc.). They hid out in Galt's Gulch. It was a peaceful war without physical force or manipulation. They let the world realize what it would be like with them not around. 

Was Ayn Rand's war more like Gandhi's Satyagraha? I do not think so. Satyagraha was emotional manipulation. "I will fast until death and my death will be on your hands" is not the kind that Ayn Rand would subscribe to. She (by her I refer to her heroes) would just leave and never be part of anything low class. Remember how John Galt quit the 20th Century Motor Company when the company announced socialistic policies.

So when confronted with stuff we can't stand what are our options? 
  • Kill, convert or rape like how Muslims and Catholics did and like how Hindus are doing now as my friend pointed out. 
  • Escape to Galt's Gulch and wait for the propitious time to return. Is this escapism? A refusal to deal with reality or with unpalatable options? A friend asked me - How can these people just run away leaving everything behind? Don't they covet material things and wealth? My answer follows. It is slightly long. No, they covet or embrace something else, their ideas and ideals which are much more important to them. They are passionate but not ambitious Galt hated to negotiate with Mr Thompson, the President of USA while the latter insisted on negotiating with Galt. Imagine how Galt would have felt negotiating with the Starnes heirs about their new HR policy and his revolutionary motor. Only if you are like Galt can you imagine the sickness you would feel having to discuss with Mr Thompson or with Starnes heirs. Can you imagine Gail Wynand discuss some serious stuff with the girl (not Dominique) he was engaged to? When Wynand told her that he was dedicating to her not his wealth and power but that quality in him that gave him his power and wealth, the girl responded to him asking him how her dress was. While discussion or negotiation is an important tool in today's world to use with opposing parties, Ayn Rand's heroes never could use it. They would rather leave or vanish. Wynand gave Peter a contract that he (Peter) wanted desperately and in return Wynand took Peter's wife. Read that passage in Fountainhead to understand how much Wynand hated even having to communicate this barter to Peter. Incidentally, while Franciso gave a long lecture about how money was not the root of all evil, he was NOT avaricious. He lived the idea of money but not about hording money itself. Quote from the acne link "Only the man who does not need it,  is fit to inherit wealth – the man who would make his own fortune no matter where he started." 
  • Show the other cheek like Gandhi suggested hoping to embarrass the opponent. As the poet Thiruvalluvar suggested 2000 years back "Inna cheidharai oruthal avarnaana Nannayam cheidu vidal" - the way to hurt someone who wronged you is to be nice to them. This probably is or includes passive aggression. There is another type where people are so naive they either don't understand what others are doing or too nice to bother about it. 
  • Is there any other way to handle this? Appoint a commission, negotiate a settlement? - probably this is the way that most of the developed world would operate. Muslims are under attack because they choose an unacceptable mechanism to deal with unpalatable things. Are there any Gandhis and Galts left? 
When you can't show the other cheek like Gandhi did, when you aren't competent and passionate and unambitious as Galt was and hence can't afford to walk away leaving everything behind and if you can't stand the idea of negotiating with people who are unlike you then you have no other option than to behave like Muslims.

Additional reading:

Saturday, March 18, 2017

Gayatri Mantra And Geeta Chanting

Muslims reciting Hindu Shlokas.

https://yourstory.com/2017/03/meet-5-year-old-firdaus-bhagwad-gita/

See also this video that a friend sent me. (the girl has a lovely voice. and see the person in the podium)




I am reminded of the song Hari Om Man Tadpat - Raag Malkauns - from the 1952 movie Baiju Bawra. The beautiful "Hindu" song was written by Shakeel Badayuni, set to tune by Naushad and sung by Rafi. Now what do you say about that? 

Movie songs in the Raag Malkauns based on its Wiki: 
Man Tarpat Hari Darshan Ko Aaj' (film Baiju Bawra, performed by Mohammad Rafi), 'Aadha Hai Chandrama Raat Aadhi' (film Navrang, performed by Mahendar Kapoor and Asha Bhosle), 'Chham Chham Ghunghroo Bole' (film Kaajal, performed by Asha Bhosle), 'Ankhiyan Sang Ankhiyaan Laagi Aaj (film Bada Aadmi)', 'Balma Maane Na' (film Opera House),  'Gori tera gaon bada pyara' (film Chitchor, performed by K.J. Yesudas). It is rather surprising that I can't seem to identify that all these songs have a common raga and even stranger is the fact that I love most of these songs. The Opera House song and the Kaajal song do seem to have the same tune. Both are dance songs.

Friday, October 28, 2016

Free Willing In Madurai and Pandyan Express

I happened to be at Madurai recently. I visited Modern Restaurant near Meenakshi Amman temple. The chutney and sambar that they serve is delicious. Apparently the restaurant has been in existence for at least 40 years, actually closer to 100 years as per my cousin who accompanied me. The food is also reasonably priced - see menu below.

Photo of Meenakshi Amman At the restaurant


Menu Card at a lovely restaurant, great chutney and sambar- must visit

Incidentally this is a nice Rajasthani restaurant in Madurai: http://www.thehindu.com/life-and-style/food/rice-vs-roti-in-madurai/article20698951.ece


Outside the station


Outside the Station. Looks quite nice.


Gentleman Operating Self Service Railway Machine / Counter


That's Pandyan Express. Rake looked absolutely new. Just 2 months old I was to find out later.


Spanking New Compartments. 


Chargers at each bay
And reached Chennai right on time. Not much else was interesting in Madurai.


In the train my cousin and I happened to discuss about free will. He mentioned a song நான் அசைத்தால் அகிலமுà®®் அசையுà®®். While the actual translation is more like "If I move even the world will shake" we both took the saying to mean that God moved everything in the world and nothing moves without His intervention. My cousin agreed that this was the intended meaning. 

I had earlier written about free will. I told my cousin that if nothing moved without Him, then Man had no free will. He agreed. In which case, I continued, it is useless to hold man to be responsible for anything in the world - good or bad. My cousin agreed. Here is where the fun started.

He said while it was true that God moved everything, it was within each of us to make ourselves Good which meant to exercise control, to avoid selfishness, arrogance etc. I asked my cousin how this was possible. He said we have to meditate... Granted that we were given or not given certain skills when we were created but it was within the best of us to rid ourselves of what is bad in us, my cousin said. And when I asked him, if nothing moved without God's will then how could we change ourselves, he insisted it was so. That practice makes a man perfect. Is it not then true that to attain perfection all that was needed was practice? And what prevents each of us from practicing, he said? I asked, can Man decide to practice all on his own - since nothing moves without God deciding to do so. So how could we practice without God willing. And this went on back and forth for half an hour.

Now he, my cousin, was very sure that he was right. And I was sure that he was violating the basic premise we had agreed on (that nothing moves without God).

The surprising thing is that I have had the same kind of response with whoever I had spoken with. What am I missing? How can one hold the basic premise and yet aver that we have the wherewithal to be good and rid ourselves of all things negative. And yes, they do concede that not many of us can do it.. That only the Gnanis and sages do. 

Another friend explained. That my cousin (and perhaps others I had discussed with) were strongly rooted to two premises from childhood - that God's will pervaded everything and second, that we had to and could change ourselves to be better. These two contradictory thoughts are perhaps entrenched in their minds from childhood. The very strong parent state prevents them from using the adult state and see the contradiction. Hmmm.


Incidentally a friend told me about Vidyarthi Bhavan in Basavangudi Bangalore. https://www.zomato.com/bangalore/vidyarthi-bhavan-basavanagudi/menu and http://www.vidyarthibhavan.in/. Very good place for masala dosa.



Entrance to Vidyarthi Bhavan
Seating Inside - Quite Old Fashioned - Definitely worth visiting

A place in Valparai  I have been hearing a lot (positively) about is Sabari Mess (Tel; +919489181602 and +918903951996).



And today I read about Bharat Coffee House in Kochi: http://www.thehindu.com/life-and-style/food/a-home-away-from-home/article18383776.ece. India Coffee House in Kannur is worth visiting. There are many branches in the city.


Additional reading:

Food for thought: http://vbala99.blogspot.com/2015/11/tirth-yatra-by-train.html

Popular Posts

Featured Post

Being In Someone's Shoes

I am back here after a long break. Many things happened in those years. I have changed a little i guess in those years. Maybe I will write a...